Drone warfare in Ukraine: interceptors, ground vehicles, and successful strikes in Crimea
Three key stories of the week: Mar. 26 - Apr. 1, 2025
The first night of April marked Russia’s pause in attacking Ukraine with drones. Was Russia testing technical modifications, or surprisingly complying with the energy ceasefire? The answer came the very next night, as the invaders attacked Kharkiv with Shaheds. Ukraine continues to improve its large arsenal of unmanned vehicles, some of which are highly efficient, such as naval drones that recently destroyed a significant amount of Russian weaponry in occupied Crimea. However, others, like ground drones, still require further development to meet expectations.
Below, you can find not only the three promised stories from the past week but also additional shorter paragraphs (and videos) about developments in drone technology and deployment by both Ukraine and Russia.
Thank you for reading and supporting my work!
Ukraine Expands Its Air Defense Drone Capabilities (Tochnyi).
Ukrainian FPV interceptors have proven their effectiveness and are an exceptionally good solution.
As of March 22, 2025, Artem, the author of the article for Tochnyi, compiled a dataset from open sources and summarized information on 2,517 unique interceptions, 2,018 of which have been geolocated. You can see the map here.
According to this study, reconnaissance drones were intercepted 20 times more frequently than strike drones. The key reason is that strike drones operate at significantly lower altitudes compared to reconnaissance drones, making them less detectable by the Armed Forces of Ukraine's radars.
Additionally, strike drones can follow a predetermined route in radio silence mode, which helps them evade electronic warfare detection. Strike drones do not loiter in the air for extended periods to observe their targets; instead, they swiftly leave the area where they could be intercepted, striking designated targets before withdrawing.
The term “FPV interceptor” is used here as a general name for all drones deployed to counter enemy UAVs. While there are many different models of interceptors, they all have key advantages over Russian reconnaissance and strike drones in terms of speed, altitude, and maneuverability.
The Serhiy Prytula Foundation has disclosed some specifications of the interceptors supplied to the military. Their cost per unit is $1,600 for a standard camera and $2,500 for a thermal imaging version. These drones have a maximum speed of 160 km/h, an operational range of up to 35 km, and a flight time of up to one hour.
A wide range of FPV interceptors and the flexibility of the market allow Ukraine to maintain an advantage over enemy drones while also enabling a swift response to future modifications and upgrades of Russian UAVs.
Speaking of Russian drone improvements, it is important to emphasize that the enemy actively seeks ways to defend against FPV interceptors.
There is little publicly available information on the specific technologies being introduced by Russians. However, even in interception footage, it is possible to observe some of these adaptations (camouflage; camera on the back + auto maneuver; antennas on Zala; antenna boxes on Supercam), but as of now, none of these modifications have proven sufficiently effective.
The author has identified three methods of neutralizing enemy drones:
Proximity Explosion
Ramming
Using a shotgun mounted on an FPV interceptor
Despite the technical challenges of equipping drones with shotguns, this concept is expected to gain new momentum with software advancements that enable autonomous targeting and firing. Such an approach could significantly reduce the cost per interception.
Currently, the speed of FPV interceptors does not allow the Armed Forces of Ukraine to effectively shoot down long-range strike drones like the Shahed.
The future innovation in this domain can be expected in the following areas:
1. Management – frontline and rear cities require the protection of FPV-interceptors. Unit rotations should not leave areas without cover.
2. Automation – processes of detection, tracking, approach, and the final initiation of the charge all have the potential to be controlled by software.
3. Capability – increases in the interceptor’s speed, which is currently a limiting factor for interceptions of the Shahed drones. This upgrade would significantly reduce Russian strike capabilities.
Ukraine is Robotizing Its Military: How an Army of 15,000 Ground Drones Will Replace Soldiers on the Frontline (Ekonomichna Pravda)